All You Need to Know About Fred Thompson

Inhofe still pushing Thompson bid

Read More...

Summary only...

Weather, Water, Energy 6-04-07

We always emphasize here that fighting global warming can be a new economic boom if properly seen and acted upon, but also that the insistence that “economic growth” will not be sacrificed is the surest way to sacrifice economic growth in what’s coming. So, when China comes out with this “plan” to fight warming with a commitment to keep doing what’s it’s been doing only with alternatives if/when they come available and no commitment to developing the new economic infrastructure to bring on the possible boom, you know that it’s pointless. Especially when it refuses to cooperate with a proposed cap of only a 2 degree Celsius increase on global temps (that’s 3.6 of our natural, all-American degrees). IOW, let the planet burn while we crazily think we can develop under these conditions and pretend the developed world should do it all when we’re becoming the world’s leading emitter. (And in case you’re thinking, “Where’s India in this tirade?,” well, here it is, self-serving as ever.) What immoral tools. At least the article nails our own pointless little leader:

US President George W Bush - whose country is the only industrialised nation apart from Australia not to ratify the protocol - has proposed uniting a group of big emitters who would set non-binding targets by the end of next year.

But some analysts say this has been interpreted as a way of undercutting other initiatives - for example by the G8 or United Nations.

I love “non-binding targets” by “the end of next year” (which coincides with the end of his presidency. . . maybe). More countries have been done in by venality than perfidy, but Bushnev has pulled them both together in a really toxic combo. Of course, big surprise, his home state is the leading emitter of all the states. And you think it will get better with Georgi gone? Here’s Fred Thompson comparing what’s happening here with a warming Mars and Jupiter and making fun of scientists who don’t believe it’s all just “solar.” . . .

Meanwhile, while all these “leaders” dither with “voluntary” (that is, who know what will happen?) plans to promote economic development, the folks responsible for that development, the business leaders, are begging the politicians to give them some clear structure of policy plans so they can start doing their own planning for, you know, that economic development. Here’s what they’re telling the G8 leaders:

"To finance the solutions and manage the risks we need a strong policy framework that tackles carbon emissions effectively while providing transparency and stability for investment decision-making" said the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change. . . .

Oh, and as the dithering crescends, we have Australia with its hottest autumn ever (which is our spring, but they’re upside down, literally), we’re warned the Himalayan glaciers could be gone in 50 years, Indonesia looks at rising sea levels the same way CA’s Delta Island folks do (that is, uh-oh), a UN report calls on nations to pay more attention to the effects of warming on animal species and their possible extinction, and another UN report lets us know that the loss of heat-reflecting ice during global warming may speed things up beyond what we’re prepared for. But, as that idiot NASA head said the other day, how arrogant of us to think that these things will be bad. (See his employee James Hansen's masterful takedown of the fool here.) . . .

Here is some truly positive news, though: GE Energy Financial Services has announced that it would double its renewable energy investments by 2010, and has become one of the first financial institutions to disclose the greenhouse gas emissions from its power plant equity investments. . . .

This news could be good or bad, I guess, depending. Turns out that rising sea levels affect the earth’s rotation, speeding it up, meaning that days will get shorter. Before you decide if it’s good or bad for you, note that the shortening will be .12 of a millisecond two centuries from now. But maybe you can still fit in that extra lesson of whatever you’ve been wanting to learn. . . .

But here’s unequivocally good news, via Grist. The Economist has an entire issue devoted to business waking up on the right side of the bed with global warming, complete with free links to all the articles. Go read.

Read More...

Summary only...

Only 540 days to go...

It's a Republican news day...

First up, great news!! A Newt '08 campaign is a "great possibility"!!! Woohoo!!!! Run, Newt, Run!!!!!

The more people saw him the less they liked him:

Gingrich proved more popular as a revolutionary than as a leader. Like Wright, he became entangled in an ethics imbroglio that eventually led to his reprimand by the House in 1997 and a $300,000 penalty.

After the Republicans in Congress shut down the government in 1995 in a showdown with President Bill Clinton, Gingrich's popularity plunged, never to return to the heights of 1994. By 1996, nearly six in 10 voters had an unfavorable opinion of him. Some of his top lieutenants even plotted a coup against him, but Gingrich, ever the survivor, managed to keep his job.

On Tuesday, election night, Gingrich pointed to the fact that Republicans had won House majorities in three successive elections for the first time in 70 years. But each majority was smaller than the last, and his troops became restless. Exit polls showed that 58 percent of the voters had an unfavorable view of him, while just 36 percent viewed him favorably.

Meanwhile, Greenwald points out that Fred Thompson is the perfect Republican candidate--he looks presidential like Reagan and he is completely, terribly hypocritical. IOKYAR!

...the only thing Libby did was commit perjury, obstruct justice and make false statements to the FBI and the Grand Jury. Everyone who reveres the Rule of Law and who laments its erosion knows that crimes like that are no big deal and that people who break those little laws should not be punished, but instead should be pardoned by their political comrades.

This marks an impressive evolution -- one could, if one were inclined to be negative, call it a complete reversal -- in Thompson's views on such lofty matters. Back in 1998, he foolishly thought that Obstruction of Justice was a Serious Crime, so serious in fact that a twice-elected President should be removed from office because of (never proven) allegations that he committed that crime. Back then, Thompson solemnly insisted that the lack of an underlying crime or even the lack of anything meaningful to be covered-up was irrelevant. That is because Our Respect for The Rule of Law demanded real punishment for such behavior

...

The notion that anyone, no matter how powerless, can get equal justice will be seen by some as a farce. And our rule of law--the principle that many other countries still dream about--the principle that sets us apart, will have been severely damaged. If this does not constitute damage to our government and our society, I cannot imagine what does. And for that he should be convicted.

That's the person who yesterday demanded that convicted felon Lewis Libby be pardoned. He's still parading around as the pious Protector of the Rule of Law, though he now does so as he protests the punishment of high government officials who are actually convicted -- rather than merely accused -- of obstructing justice.

Read More...

Summary only...